<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost of Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403</link>
	<description>Teaching &#38; Learning in the new information landscape...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roland O'Daniel</title>
		<link>http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403#comment-485205</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland O'Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403#comment-485205</guid>
		<description>David,
I'm not sure of the entire issue, but one of the main online directories that keeps track of spam domains experienced technical difficulty, during the week of March 24-28, and named all domains as spam rather than filtering as usual. Some anti-spam systems rely on that directory and a couple of others for their filtering. The misbehaving directory has been removed, which will now allow e-mail to go through but there will be a slight increase in spam that actually gets through also. That is one possible short term explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
I&#8217;m not sure of the entire issue, but one of the main online directories that keeps track of spam domains experienced technical difficulty, during the week of March 24-28, and named all domains as spam rather than filtering as usual. Some anti-spam systems rely on that directory and a couple of others for their filtering. The misbehaving directory has been removed, which will now allow e-mail to go through but there will be a slight increase in spam that actually gets through also. That is one possible short term explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie A. Roy</title>
		<link>http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403#comment-484970</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie A. Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidwarlick.com/2cents/archives/1403#comment-484970</guid>
		<description>Anyone ever wonder if the anti-spam software group is behind all the spam?  It would be a great piece of investigative journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone ever wonder if the anti-spam software group is behind all the spam?  It would be a great piece of investigative journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
